Article Review · Science · 2010

MOF-210 and the Limits of Porosity

PaperUltrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks
AuthorsH. Furukawa, N. Ko, Y. B. Go, N. Aratani, S. B. Choi, E. Choi, A. O. Yazaydin, R. Q. Snurr, M. O'Keeffe, J. Kim, O. M. Yaghi
PublishedScience, 2010
DOI10.1126/science.1192160
Read the Original Paper ↗

Six years after MOF-177 set the porosity record, the same school broke it twice in one paper. MOF-200 and MOF-210, built from expanded triangular and mixed linkers in non-interpenetrating topologies, posted BET surface areas around 4,530 and 6,240 m2/g, ultra-low crystal densities near 0.25 g/cm3, and correspondingly huge capacities: MOF-210's excess hydrogen uptake at 77 K reached about 8.6 weight percent.

What elevates this beyond record-chasing is the theoretical framing, courtesy of Snurr's simulations. The paper explicitly discusses the geometric ceiling on surface area for carbon-based struts, pointing toward limits in the 10,000 m2/g class, and treats the new materials as steps toward a knowable maximum rather than an open-ended race. Records with an articulated asymptote are science; records without one are sport.

The usual caveats attend. These giant-pore zinc frameworks are moisture-sensitive, activation requires supercritical CO2 drying, and gravimetric records flatter materials whose volumetric performance, the number an engineer sizing a fuel tank actually needs, is undermined by their own emptiness. The paper reports volumetric figures honestly, and they are notably less spectacular, a tension the abstract does not advertise.

Read alongside NU-110 two years later, MOF-210 marks the moment the porosity frontier met diminishing returns and community attention began migrating from how empty to how useful. As the high-water mark of a fifteen-year design program, it earns its place here.

Reviewer's VerdictA record paper that, unusually, theorizes its own obsolescence.

This review reflects the independent opinion of Team LR at MOFsResearch.com. It is an educational commentary on the cited publication and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the original authors or publisher. Verify all figures against the original paper before use.